Crea sito
Majestic
SCIENTIFIC ALLUSIONS IN SCRIPTURE…

Non è il caso di essere presuntuosi,
infatti, anche se le scoperte scientifiche sono cresciute in maniera esponenziale,
nell'ultimo secolo
tuttavia, ciò che ancora ignoriamo sulla composizione della materia
e sulla composizione della vita è molto, MOLTO,
MAGGIORE di quello che abbiamo scoperto!


Il sospetto legittimo è che questa teoria evoluzionistica
almeno così come ci viene propugnata
sia una trappola del materialismo ideologico.
Materialismo che filosoficamente domina nelle nostre università.
Se questo fosse vero, sarebbe il più grande inganno scientifico della storia,
perchè la "teoria", che viene millantata per evidenza scientifica da quasi 150 anni, è ancora una "teoria",
dato che non un solo fossile è stato ritrovato, come prova del passaggio da una delle milioni di specie del nostro pianeta, ad un'altra.
Mentre prove fossili molto numerose riportano la presenza dei trilobiti
(che sarebbero esistiti solo dopo gli organismi monocellulari)
insieme a orme di calzature umane evolute
ecc...
Questo porterebbe, come conseguenza, non solo il crollo del comunismo dal punto di vista politico,
ma sarebbe il crollo del materialismo culturale e del relativismo etico,
che tanta distruzione sta portando nella nostra società occidentale.

Uno degli otto scienziati mondiali della "QUANTUM ALGEBRA",
ATTRAVERSO UNA FORMULA LUNGA OTTO PAGINE,
HA DIMOSTRATO CHE TUTTO L'UNIVERSO NON è PIù VECCHIO DI 9000 ANNI.
I SUOI COLLEGHI NON POTENDO CONFUTARE TALE CALCOLO
GLI HANNO RISPOSTO CHE LA CONCLUSIONE EVIDENTE,
NON PUò ESSERE ACCETTATA IDEOLOGICAMENTE.

Si invita chi di competenza a verificare tali affemazioni.

PREMESSO CHE LA TEORIA DELLA EVOLUZIONE INTACCA SOLTANTO LA STORICITà DI GENESI,
MA NON IL SUO VALORE TEOLOGICO.
PERCHè UN DIO CHE SIA CREATORE ATTRAVERSO GLI ANNI LUCE DI UNA LENTA EVOLUZIONE,
è ASSOLUTAMENTE COMPATIBILE CON IL SUO ESSERE "ETERNO"
OLTRE LO SPAZIO E IL TEMPO.

Non posso dimenticare la notizia della televisione di stato "RAI DUE",
che annunciava come la NASA
attraverso le sue sofisticate tecnologie aveva concluso
essere il pianeta terra al centro dell'universo.

Questo sarebbe compatibile con la spiegazione
di una fuga delle galassie con l'evento del peccato.
In quel momento esse hanno incominciato a "fuggire",
poichè l'armonia e l'ordine voluto da Dio erano stati sovvertiti con il peccato.
Ora la dilatazione dello spazio avrebbe portato
alla dilatazione del tempo per la legge della RELATIVITà!
Questa legge vede direttamente proporzionali lo spazio con il tempo.
Ora, il concetto di creazione dinamica,
non solo concepisce la creazione all'interno di un processo evolutivo,
ma addirittura, come un cantante tiene in vita la sua canzone,
e come un ballerino tiene in vita, con il suo ballo continuo,
la sua danza,
così Dio, certamente, tiene continuamente in vita la sua creazione.
La Creazione è dinamica certamente!
Ma questa creazione dinamica,
si è realizzata attraverso una creazione "settimanale" o evoluzionistica?
Come avete capito,
la realtà scientifica non scalfisce il concetto dinamico creativo di creazione.

******************************************************

APPELLO!

CHIUNQUE HA LE COMPETENZE PER ESSERE UN RICERCATORE,
APPROFONDISCA QUESTI SEGUENTI APPUNTI TRATTI DAL MUSEO E DALL'EQUIPE
DI SCIENZIATI CHE HANNO APERTO UN MUSEO E CONSEGUENTI STUDI SCIENTIFICI
CHIAMATI:
"EVIDENZA DELLA CREAZIONE NEL XXI SECOLO".
*******************************************

PURTROPPO CI SONO MOLTE SCIMMIE CHE SANNO FARE I PAFFAGALLI,
MA POCHE MENTI LIBERE ED ECCELLENTI!
AIUTO!!!
**********************************



Gli scienziati sono unanimi nel definire il cervello umano,
come la struttura più complessa dell'universo,
ora non è possibile che l'effetto sia superiore alla causa.
Non è logico concludere che un solo cervello sia più strutturato e complesso dell'intero universo.
Nel museo dell'evidenza della Creazione nel XXI secolo,
vi sono molti fossili che dimostrano la coesistenza degli uomini con i dinosauri,
dove per la teoria evoluzionistica al tempo dei dinosuari non avrebbero potuto esistere neanche gli ominidi.
***********************
Program airs on Tuesday evenings,
6:00 pm CDT.
and 11:30 p.m.
Fridays CDT.
Times are subject to change.
DVDs of the telecast are now available.
Call the museum for more information ( 254-897-3200).
Dr Carl Baugh,
Director of the Creation Evidence Museum will be hosting the television series on TBN
(Trinity Broadcasting Network),
entitled "Creation in the 21st Century".
The program airs every Tuesday evenings,
6:00 pm (CDT),
and 11:30 p.m.
Fridays (CDT).
As times are subject to change without notice,
check TBN for schedule changes.
If you have questions about the creation-evolution debate,
tune in and learn why we can come to a scientific
and logical conclusion that a Creator designed the universe,
based on the evidence.
This series will be both fascinating and informative.

If you appreciate this kind of programming from TBN,
be sure and write the television studio and tell them how much you are enjoying the shows.
It only takes a few minutes,
and it is vital to keep this kind of programming on the air.
To ensure more of this kind of telecast,
write:
Creation in the 21st Century.
PO Box A,
Santa Ana, CA 92711.
or email TBN at:
[email protected]
Thanks,
your input could make the difference!
***************************.
Creation Model Session Four On day three the dry land and all its attendant elements appeared.
A solid granite crust provided form for the surface of the young planet.
The ferromagnetic core maintained alignment of the magnetic field.
Radioactive elements with adjacent moderating units formed foundations
and a controlled nuclear reactor within earth's interior.
Masses of hydrocarbon assumed their role as a swaddling band"
to moderate temperatures in the adjacent water reservoirs.

These warm waters fountained up through granite,
clays,
and sands to re-circulate back into the subterranean reservoir and form a dynamic hydrocycle.
A great supercontinent was outlined on the planet's surface.
Luxuriant plants were created with their fruit and seeds fully formed,
thus incorporating "immediate youth" and "functional maturity.
"
On day four stellar heavens were formed from the mass
and energy inherent in the universal flood of light registered on day one.
As the microcosmic structure of the atoms would permit seven "shells" of particles above its nucleus,
the macrocosmic structure of the heavens above would cluster seven distinct "spheres"
of star bodies on a universal scale.
Designed in harmony with the biorhythms of Earth's living systems,
these stellar instruments provided functional time and energy to the universe as a whole.


[ Session Three | Session Five ]
http://www.creationevidence.org
/cemframes.html
********************.
Creation Model
Session Thirteen
"Thou art worthy,
0 Lord,
to receive glory and honor and power:
for thou hast created all things,
and for thy pleasure they are and were created," (Rev. 4:12).
Since the Creator expressed His own glory and radiance in the creation of light on day one,
all the physical universe,
which was made from that light,
is a manifestation of His power and person.
As that creation was marred,
His person was dishonored and marred at Calvary.
But,
as He arose over death on the morning of the resurrection,
ultimately the universe will be restored to perfection.
In that day glory,
honor and power will be received by the One who gave it "in the beginning" .
He submitted Himself as the Lamb,
and will duly reign as Lion over the universe.

[ Session Twelve | Back to Session One ]
http://www.creationevidence.org
**********************.
EVIDENCE FOR CREATION
1.
The Fossil Record...
Evolutionists have constructed the Geologic Column in order to illustrate
the supposed progression of "primitive" life forms to "more complex" systems we observe today.
Yet,
"since only a small percentage of the earth's surface obeys even a portion of the geologic column
the claim of their having taken place to form a continuum of rock/life/time
over the earth is therefore a fantastic and imaginative contrivance.
1" "[T]he lack of transitional series cannot be explained as being due to the scarcity of material.

The deficiencies are real,
they will never be filled.
"2 This supposed column is actually saturated with "polystrate fossils"
(fossils extending from one geologic layer to another) that tie all the layers to one time-frame.
"[T]o the unprejudiced,
the fossil record of plants is in favor of special creation" 3.

2.
Decay of Earth's Magnetic Field... Dr. Thomas Barnes,
Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of Texas at El Paso,
has published the definitive work in this field 4 Scientific observations since 1829
have shown that the earth's magnetic field has been measurably decaying at an exponential rate,
demonstrating its half-life to be approximately 1,400 years.
In practical application its strength 20000 years ago
would approximate that of a magnetic star.
Under those conditions many of the atoms necessary for life processes could not form.
These data demonstrate that earth's entire history is young,
within a few thousand of years.

3.
The Global Flood...
The Biblical record clearly describes a global Flood during Noah's day.
Additionally,
there are hundreds of Flood traditions handed down through cultures all over the world.
5 M.
E. Clark and Henry Voss have demonstrated the scientific validity of such a Flood providing the sedimentary layering we see on every continent.
6 Secular scholars report very rapid sedimentation and periods of great carbonate deposition in earth's sedimentary layers.
.7 It is now possible to prove the historical reality of the Biblical Flood.
8
4.
Population Statistics.
.
.
World population growth rate in recent times is about 2% per year.
Practicable application of growth rate throughout human history would be about half that number.
Wars,
disease,
famine,
etc.
have wiped out approximately one third of the population on average every 82 years.
Starting with eight people,
and applying these growth rates since the Flood of Noah's day (about 4500 years ago) would give a total human population at just under six billion people.
However,
application on an evolutionary time scale runs into major difficulties.
Starting with one "couple" just 41,
000 years ago would give us a total population of 2 x 1089.
9 The universe does not have space to hold so many bodies.

5.
Radio Halos.
.
.
Physicist Robert Gentry has reported isolated radio halos of polonuim-214 in crystalline granite.
The half-life of this element is 0.
000164 seconds!
To record the existence of this element in such short time span,
the granite must be in crystalline state instantaneously.
10 This runs counter to evolutionary estimates of 300 million years for granite to form.

6.
Human Artifacts throughout the Geologic Column.
.
.
Man-made artifacts - such as the hammer in Cretaceous rock,
a human sandal print with trilobite in Cambrian rock,
human footprints and a handprint in Cretaceous rock – point to the fact that all the supposed geologic periods actually occurred at the same time in the recent past.
11
7.
Helium Content in Earth's Atmosphere.
.
.
Physicist Melvin Cook,
Nobel Prize medalist found that helium-4 enters our atmosphere from solar wind and radioactive decay of uranium.
At present rates our atmosphere would accumulate current helium-4 amounts in less than 10,
000 years.
12
8.
Expansion of Space Fabric.
.
.
Astronomical estimates of the distance to various galaxies gives conflicting data.
13 The Biblical Record refers to the expansion of space by the Creator14.
Astrophysicist Russell Humphries demonstrates that such space expansion would dilate time in distant space.
15 This could explain a recent creation with great distances to the stars.

9.
Design in Living Systems.
.
.
A living cell is so awesomely complex that its interdependent components stagger the imagination and defy evolutionary explanations.
A minimal cell contains over 60,
000 proteins of 100 different configurations.
16 The chance of this assemblage occurring by chance is 1 in 10 4,
478,
296 .
17
10.
Design in the Human Brain.
.
.
The human brain is the most complicated structure in the known universe.
18 It contains over 100 billion cells,
each with over 50,
000 neuron connections to other brain cells.
19 This structure receives over 100 million separate signals from the total human body every second.
If we learned something new every second of our lives,
it would take three million years to exhaust the capacity of the human brain.
20 In addition to conscious thought,
people can actually reason,
anticipate consequences,
and devise plans - all without knowing they are doing so.
21
1Woodmorappe,
John,
"The Essential Non-Existence of the Evolutionary Uniformitarian Geologic Column:
A Quantitative Assessment,
" Creation Research Society Quarterly,
vol.
18,
no.
1 (Terre Haute,
Indiana,
June 1981),
pp.
46-71
2 Nilsson,
N.
Heribert,
as quoted in Arthur C.
Custance,
The Earth Before Man,
Part II,
Doorway Papers,
no.
20 (Ontario,
Canada:
Doorway Publications),
p.
51
3Corner,
E.
J.
H.
,
Contemporary Botanical Thought,
ed.
A.
M.
MacLeod and L.
S.
Cobley (Chicago:
Quadrangle Books,
1961),
p.
97
4Barnes,
Thomas,
ICR Technical Monograph #4,
Origin and Destiny of the Earth's Magnetic Field (2nd edition,
1983)
5Blick,
Edward,
A Scientific Analysis of Genesis (Oklahoma City:
Hearthstone,
1991) p.
103
6Clark,
M.
E.
and Voss,
H.
D.
,
"Fluid Mechanic Examination of the Tial Mechanism for Producing Mega-Sedimantary Layering" (Third International Conference on Creation,
Pittsburg,
July 1994)
7Ager,
Derek,
The Nature of the Stratigraphical Record (New York:
John Wiley and Sons) p.
43 and p.
86
8West,
John Anthony,
Serpent in the Sky:
The High Wisdom of Ancient Egypt (New York:
Julian Press,
1987) pp.
13-14
9 See Morris,
Henry,
Scientific Creationism (El Cajon,
CA:
Master Books)
10Gentry,
Robert,
Creation's Tiny Mystery (Knoxville,
Tenn.
:
Earth Science Assoc.
,
1988)
11 Baugh,
Carl,
Why Do Men Believe Evolution AGAINST ALL ODDS?
(Oklahoma City:
Hearthstone,
1999)
12Cook,
Melvin,
"Where is The Earth's Radiogenic Helium?
" Nature,
Vol.
179,
p.
213
13Cowan,
R.
,
"Further Evidence of a Youthful Universe,
" Science News,
Vol.
148,
p.
166
14Psalm 104:
2;
Isaiah 40:
22
15Humphries,
Russell,
Starlight and Time (Green Forest,
AR:
Master Books,
1994)
16Denton,
Michael,
Evolution:
A Theory in Crisis (Bethesda,
Maryland:
Adler & Adler,
1986) p.
263
17 Mastropaolo,
Joseph,
"Evolution Is Biologically Impossible,
" Impact # 317 (El Cajon,
CA:
Institute For Creation Research,
1999) p.
4
18Restak,
Richard,
The Brain:
The Last Frontier,
1979,
p.
390
19The Brain,
Our Universe Within,
PBS Video
20Wonders of God's Creation,
Moody Video Series
21Weiss,
Joseph,
"Unconscious Mental Functioning,
" Scientific American,
March 1990,
p.
103
[ Coal:
Evidence/Young Earth | Evidence for Creation | Magnetic Field | Created Earth |
Macroevolution | Mammoths | Carbon Dating | Evidence for Creation-2 | Scientific Allusions in Scripture ]

http://www.creationevidence.org
****************************.

Welcome to ,
the web site of the Creation Evidence Museum in Glen Rose,
Texas.
As you browse our pages you will receive educational information presenting scientific evidence for creation and design by a personal Creator.
This scientifically chartered museum was established in July of 1984 for the purpose of research,
excavation,
and display of scientific evidence for creation.
The Museum's team,
led by its Founder and Director,
Carl Baugh,
Ph.
D.
,
has excavated eleven dinosaurs (Acrocanthosaurus,
Stegosaurus,
Allosaurus,
etc.
),
475 dinosaur tracks,
86 human footprints,
7 cat prints,
and other fossil remains - all in Cretaceous limestone.
Excavations were professionally documented along the Paluxy River and various other international locations.
Among museums this entity makes a unique contribution,
demonstrating that man and dinosaur lived contemporaneously.
Educators,
professors,
children,
and adherents to various religions are finding answers to the great questions of life:
Who am I?
,
Where did I come from?
,
What is my purpose here?
,
and Where am I going?
In its ongoing research to find answers to Who is God?
,
Was the Universe designed and created by a Creator?
,
and What do the Bible and Science teach about the heavens,
man,
animals,
plants,
etc?
,
the Museum researches and houses artifacts from archaeology,
geology,
and paleontology (such as the London artifact,
the Meister Print,
the cup in coal,
the fossilized foot in a boot,
the fossilized human finger,
and others).
This original research contributes significant information to the controversy between the theories of life origins,
namely creation vs evolution.
The Museum's research involves experimentation and simulation of Earth's original pre-Flood environment in the world's first hyperbaric biosphere.
Various teaching aids,
books,
videos,
tapes,
and other resources are available through the Museum.


Enter!

***************************.
The Earths Magnetic Field
Many people know that the earth has a magnetic field,
but few are aware that this field is shrinking.
This decrease has been measured over a period of 150 years,
and the rate of the decrease shows that something very earth-shaking took place less than 6000 years ago.
The fossil record contains evidence of great disturbances in the field that give us an idea of the magnitude of the geologic events during Noah's flood.
This fact sheet answers some common questions on this subject,
beginning with basic questions about magnetism and ending with some current theories about geomagnetism.
What's a magnet?
Everyone knows what a magnet is,
or what a magnet does.
An invisible force (the magnetic field) attracts iron objects.
This force can be very strong.
A better question is ``Why does a magnet attract iron objects?
''.
For this we must take a look at what a magnet is made of.
If you take a bar magnet and break it in half,
you end up with two smaller bar magnets.
If you break the halves into fourths,
you get four small bar magnets.
If you have enough patience and time you can repeat this until you have millions of microscopic magnets.
All magnets have two poles;
a north pole and a south pole.
We call this a dipole (two poles).
Two north poles or south poles repel each other.
Try forcing the two north poles of two bar magnets together.
The unseen magnetic field makes it feel like there's a water balloon between them resisting your push.
Opposite poles (a north and a south) attract strongly.
How do you make a magnet?
Since opposite poles attract,
you can put two magnets together to make a larger magnet.
If you have many little magnets,
you can keep adding magnets into a larger mass and have one large,
strong magnet.
Some molecules,
some atoms,
and all electrons are little magnets.
So why isn't everything magnetic?
In most matter,
the molecules,
atoms,
and electrons are all jumbled up together.
In a strong magnet,
most of the little magnets (magnetic domains if you want to get fancy) point in the same direction.
This makes the magnetic force of all the little magnets add up to make a large magnet,
called a permanent magnet.
Free magnets tend to align with each other.
You can try this by placing one magnet on a table and slowly moving another magnet toward it.
The magnet that is loose on the table turns to align with the magnet in your hand.
If you stroke a piece of iron with a magnet,
you gradually align the little magnetic domains,
and the result is a larger magnet.
Electric current is the flow of electrons through a conductor.
A conductor is a material that lets the electrons hop from atom to atom when influenced by an outside force.
If you move a wire (which is an electric conductor) through a magnetic field,
you force (induce) the electrons to travel in one direction through the wire.
Electrons flowing through a conductor create a magnetic field around the conductor.
This is called electromagnetism.

Can you ´unmake´ a magnet?

A stronger magnet can partially realign the magnetic domains of a weaker magnet.

Many different substances can be made into permanent magnets.
However,
for all these materials,
there is a critical temperature called the Curie point.
At this temperature or above,
the molecules within the material are moving around too much for the material
to retain the magnetic alignment necessary to exhibit a magnetic field.

How big can a magnet be?

We live on a magnet.
The earth itself has a large magnetic field called the geomagnetic field.
You can see the effects of the field when you use a compass to find out which direction is north.
Earth's magnetic field is very complicated.
It can be thought of as being one large magnetic dipole with twelve more small magnets arranged at various angles.
A curious fact about Earth's magnetic field is that it is not lined up with the spin axis.
Its alignment is about 11 degrees off the axis defined by the north and south poles.
(Without knowing this,
you can't find the North pole using only a compass!
)
What does Earth's magnetic field do for us?
The magnetic field helps us find our way around.
Using a compass,
we can tell which way is north even when there are no familiar landmarks in sight.
The magnetic field shields us from much harmful radiation.
Cosmic rays come from all directions,
and the sun sends out a steady stream of high-energy particles known as the solar wind.
Genesis 1:
6 describes the firmament (Hebrew raqia) separating the water below from the water above.
Before the flood described in Genesis,
the magnetic field may even have helped to suspend the firmament above the earth.
Is the Earth's field changing?
Scientists have made many careful measurements of the magnetic field over 150 years.
These measurements show that the magnetic field is slowly shrinking.
The intensity of the field decreases by half in 1400 years.
This means that as time goes on we have less protection from cosmic radiation and the solar wind.
How strong has it been?
In 560 A.
D.
the field was twice as strong as it is now.
In David's kingdom it was four times as strong.
In Noah's time it was eight times as strong.
There are limits to how intense the magnetic field could have been.
If we assume that the field has been decaying at the same rate for 10,
000 years,
the field would have been more intense than that of a magnetic star.
The heat and electrical extremes from such conditions would have made life on earth impossible.
This presents a significant problem for evolutionists and their belief in a 4.
6-billion-year-old earth.
Their answer is the dynamo theory,
which assumes that the core of the earth is made of molten metal (iron-nickel mixture).
Molten material inside the earth is far hotter than the Curie point,
which means that the earth as a whole is not a permanent magnet;
it must be an electromagnet.
The dynamo theory is that slow,
internal convection currents or planetary rotation generates the magnetic field,
and that this mechanism has operated for the assumed 4.
6 billion years.
Since This theory also claims that the field reverses over extremely long periods of time.
Did the field ever change directions?
Of course,
it's dangerous to observe a process for a relatively short period of time and then declare that the process has been behaving in exactly that way for all of time.
This approach is routinely seen in traditional geology and paleontology (``.
.
.
the present is the key to the past.
'').
However,
in this case uniformitarianism is denounced by the evolutionists.
They point to paleomagnetic measurements in rock formations.
As sediment accumulates or as molten rock cools,
the earth's magnetic field is believed to have aligned the magnetic domains within the material as it hardened,
locking in a record of the orientation of the geomagnetic field at the time.
Measurements of the magnetic-field polarity in ancient volcanic lava flows show that Earths magnetic field gyrated wildly at one point in time.
Other evidence for a change is that the residual magnetic fields in rock formed on the ocean floor where the great tectonic plates are pulling apart show a number of different orientations.
The traditional assumption here is that these processes went on at the same rate in the past as we observe today.
However,
during the flood,
when cataclysmic geologic events were occurring at a rapid pace,
these processes may have been recording what happened to the magnetic field over weeks or months instead of hundreds of thousands of years.
Dr.
D.
R.
Humphreys has studied the physical evidence of magnetic-field reversal and decay and developed a model that describes the magnetic field as having a high initial strength,
a series of rapid reversals during the flood year,
slower variations until the time of Christ's earthly ministry,
then gradual steady decay.
The idea that the geomagnetic field could have rapidly reversed was rejected by the evolutionary community,
even though a much larger body,
the Sun,
reverses its field every eleven years.
Recent discoveries have added more weight to Dr.
Humphreys model.
The April 5,
1995 edition (Vol.
14) of Science News reported on a Nature article that researchers are finding fresh evidence of extremely-rapid field orientation shifts,
as much as six degrees per day.
The article states that ``if that happened today,
compass needles would swing from magnetic north toward Mexico City in little over a week''.
The article quotes one geophysicist as saying ``that shows the core to be violently active in terms of the magnetic field''.
Violently active?
``...
on that day all the fountains of the deep were broken up...'' Genesis 7:11,
NKJV.
*************************
Will the field build back up again?
- Earth seems to have a broken generator.
More of the observable facts support the model proposed by Dr.
Humphreys.
Whatever happened in the past,
hard evidence exists for a freely-decaying geomagnetic field now.
A collapsing magnetic field encounters resistance,
which generates electrical current,
which generates more magnetic energy.
The result is a slow decay unless new energy is released into the decaying system from an outside source.
``He who was sat on the throne said `Behold,
I make all things new!
'''...
Revelation 21:5,
NKJV.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright © Creation Evidences Museum, 1995
[ Coal:
Evidence/Young Earth | Evidence for Creation | Magnetic Field | Created Earth | Macroevolution | Mammoths | Carbon Dating | Evidence for Creation-2 | Scientific Allusions in Scripture ] http://www.creationevidence.org/cemframes.html

************************************.
Creation Science Briefs
Subject:
Carbon Dating
A less-common form of the carbon atom,
carbon-14,
is used today by scientists as a method to date once-living organisms.
Many people believe that carbon dating disproves the Biblical time scale of history.
However,
because of the difficulties with current C14 dating techniques,
the dates produced have been shown to be faulty.
Carbon-14 is produced in the upper atmosphere by action of cosmic rays.
Once the C 14 has been formed,
by converting nitrogen-14 into carbon-14,
it behaves like ordinary carbon-12,
combining with oxygen to give carbon dioxide,
and freely cycling through the cells of all plants and animals.
Carbon-14 is used for a dating material because once it has been formed,
C14 begins to decay radioactively back to nitrogen-14,
at a rate of change that can be measured.
As soon as an organism dies,
the C14 atoms which decay are no longer replaced by new ones through respiration.
Consequently,
the ratio of C14 to C12 in that once-living organism decreases as time goes on.
The problem with the carbon dating method is—scientists can not be sure of what the C14/C12 ratio was when the organism died.
Carbon dating assumes that the ratio has remained constant;
however,
events,
such as the industrial revolution,
are known to have raised C12 levels.
Other possible factors,
such as the presence of a water canopy,
would have lowered the amount of C14 in the pre-Flood world.
Because pre-Flood specimens had so little carbon-14 in them,
some might appear to have been decaying for tens of thousands of years.
Also,
the decay of the earth’s magnetic field would have direct effects on C14 level,
again,
giving artificially old ages the farther you go back in time.
Finally,
carbon dating has been shown untrustworthy with some present day aquatic specimens
that were concluded to be thousands of years old.
For example,
the shells of living snails’ were carbon dated and showed that the snails had died 27000 years ago.
Other specimens have been carbon dated more than once,
each time producing a different date varying by thousands of years.
In overview,
we see that the radiocarbon dating method is certainly no embarrassment to the Biblical creationist who believes in a young earth.
In fact,
when all data,
such as the decay of the magnetic field and the canopy,
is taken into accord,
carbon dating seems to support a young earth.
CEM Staff
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Coal:
Evidence/Young Earth | Evidence for Creation | Magnetic Field | Created Earth |
Macroevolution | Mammoths | Carbon Dating | Evidence for Creation-2 | Scientific Allusions in Scripture ]
http://www.creationevidence.org
***************************.
Creation Science Briefs
Subject:
Carbon Dating
A less-common form of the carbon atom,
carbon-14,
is used today by scientists as a method to date once-living organisms.
Many people believe that carbon dating disproves the Biblical time scale of history.
However,
because of the difficulties with current C14 dating techniques,
the dates produced have been shown to be faulty.
Carbon-14 is produced in the upper atmosphere by action of cosmic rays.
Once the C 14 has been formed,
by converting nitrogen-14 into carbon-14,
it behaves like ordinary carbon-12,
combining with oxygen to give carbon dioxide,
and freely cycling through the cells of all plants and animals.
Carbon-14 is used for a dating material because once it has been formed,
C14 begins to decay radioactively back to nitrogen-14,
at a rate of change that can be measured.
As soon as an organism dies,
the C14 atoms which decay are no longer replaced by new ones through respiration.
Consequently,
the ratio of C14 to C12 in that once-living organism decreases as time goes on.
The problem with the carbon dating method is—scientists can not be sure of what the C14/C12 ratio was when the organism died.
Carbon dating assumes that the ratio has remained constant;
however,
events,
such as the industrial revolution,
are known to have raised C12 levels.
Other possible factors,
such as the presence of a water canopy,
would have lowered the amount of C14 in the pre-Flood world.
Because pre-Flood specimens had so little carbon-14 in them,
some might appear to have been decaying for tens of thousands of years.
Also,
the decay of the earth’s magnetic field would have direct effects on C14 level,
again,
giving artificially old ages the farther you go back in time.
Finally,
carbon dating has been shown untrustworthy with some present day aquatic specimens
that were concluded to be thousands of years old.
For example,
the shells of living snails’ were carbon dated and showed that the snails had died 27000 years ago.
Other specimens have been carbon dated more than once,
each time producing a different date varying by thousands of years.
In overview,
we see that the radiocarbon dating method is certainly
no embarrassment to the Biblical creationist who believes in a young earth.
In fact,
when all data,
such as the decay of the magnetic field and the canopy,
is taken into accord,
carbon dating seems to support a young earth.
CEM Staff
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Coal:
Evidence/Young Earth | Evidence for Creation | Magnetic Field |
Created Earth | Macroevolution | Mammoths | Carbon Dating | Evidence for Creation-2 | Scientific Allusions in Scripture ]
*************************************.
"Coal:
Evidence for a Young Earth"
Abstract:
Evolutionary theory requires millions of years in the formation of coal in order to afford time for the development of living organisms
whose fossils are found in coal deposits.
However,
laboratory and field research has demonstrated that coal is formed rapidly and in vast quantities.
These vast coal deposits are unsullied by other material.
The conclusion is drawn that actual research indicates a young age to the Earth that contains such coalified materials.

Introduction
"If coal takes millions and millions of years of heat and pressure to form,
how is it possible that creationists are teaching that the earth is only a few thousand years old?
" This is a commonly asked question among individuals seeking answers about the age of the earth and the universe.
Research has been done by several creation organizations,
as well as independent scientists,
in order to answer such questions.
The evidence actually shows that coal does not take millions of years to form,
as is commonly asserted.
In fact,
the formation of coal has been proven to be a rapid process that can be duplicated in modern laboratories in a matter of days - or even hours.

I.
Rapid Formation
In order for coal to be formed,
several factors must be present.
Pressure,
temperature,
water,
time,
and some sort of vegetation are the key elements for the formation of coal.
According to evolutionary theory,
the slow accumulation and decomposition of vegetation living in past ages accounts for the coal seams.
However,
this theory can not answer why such large amounts of original vegetation without soil can be found in the areas that are now coal seams,
or how these coal seams became so thick - some being over two hundred feet in depth.
Scientist Robert Gentry analyzed coalified wood found on the Colorado Plateau in order to determine how long it took for coal to form.
1 By treating coal with epoxy and slicing it into thin sheets,
Dr.
Gentry was able to examine tiny,
compressed radiohalos found in the coal.
Radiohalos are discolorations in the coal,
ejected by radioactive elements in the centers (such as uranium).
According to evolutionary theory,
in order for these halos to form,
several processes must have occurred.
First,
water-saturated logs must have been laid down in several different geologic formations,
including the Triassic,
Jurassic and Eocene layers.
Later,
uranium solutions infiltrated the water-saturated logs,
and uranium decay products were collected at tiny sites within the logs.
The radioactive decay from the tiny particles ejected spherical radiation damage regions around those sites,
thus producing halos.
Finally,
a pressure event on the site of the formations compressed the logs as well as the radioactive halos within them.
However,
because coal is not a malleable substance,
scientists know that these logs had not turned to coal at the time the compression event occurred.
This points to a quick burial and coalification of the logs – rather than a long time period.
2
II.
Decay Ratios

When the ratio of uranium decay to its decay product (lead) is analyzed,
the conclusion is drawn that all the logs within the various geologic formations were buried at the same time.
The high lead-to-uranium ratios admit the possibility that both the initial uranium infiltration
and the coalification could possibly have occurred within the past several thousand years 3

III.
Polystrate Fossils

The presence of "polystrate" trees (trees petrified or coalified in an upright position) point to a rapid coalification process.
One of the most commonly known polystrate trees is found at Katherine Hill Bay,
Australia.
This fossilized tree can be seen extending over twelve feet,
through several sedimentary layers.
According to evolutionary theory the different sedimentary layers took hundreds of thousands of years to accumulate.
However,
we know this is impossible since the tree would have decomposed long before the sediments would have had time to accumulate.
Rather,
this tree is testimony to the catastrophic and rapid burial that must have taken place.

IV.
Unsullied Deposits
Finally,
coal seams such as those found in the Powder River Basin of Gillette,
Wyoming,
ranging from 150 to 200 feet in depth,
point to a rapid coalification process.
"These coal seams run remarkably thick and unsullied by other material.
Usually,
unwanted sediments,
such as clay,
washes over a deposit before coal seams can get very thick.
This leaves scientists with the baffling question of how the seams get so massive
and still remain undiluted by influxes of clay and other impurities before they thicken"4.

Conclusion
The answer can be found in the Biblical account of Noah's Flood.
The Biblical description
of the fountains of the great deep breaking up gives strong reference to volcanic activity in the pre-Flood basins 5.
This would have provided several of the key factors need for the production of coal,
along with an explanation of how the process could have occurred at such a rapid pace.
Although the coalification process has been used in the past to support theories of an aged universe,
research done by leading creation scientists reveals that this process actually supports creation teachings of a young Earth.
Physical evidence demonstrates that the coalification process must have occurred rapidly,
rather than over vast time periods.

CEM Staff Writer
1Robert V.
Gentry,
Video:
Young Age of the Earth
2Ibid.
3Science , October 15, 1996
4Earth Magazine, May 1993
5Genesis,
chapter seven
[ Coal:
Evidence/Young Earth | Evidence for Creation | Magnetic Field |
Created Earth | Macroevolution | Mammoths | Carbon Dating | Evidence for Creation-2 | Scientific Allusions in Scripture ]

http://www.creationevidence.org
****************************.
"Coal:
Evidence for a Young Earth"
Abstract:
Evolutionary theory requires millions of years in the formation of coal
in order to afford time for the development of living organisms whose fossils are found in coal deposits.
However,

laboratory and field research has demonstrated that coal is formed rapidly and in vast quantities.

These vast coal deposits are unsullied by other material.

The conclusion is drawn that actual research indicates a young age to the Earth that contains such coalified materials.

Introduction
"If coal takes millions and millions of years of heat and pressure to form,
how is it possible that creationists are teaching that the earth is only a few thousand years old?
" This is a commonly asked question among individuals seeking answers about the age of the earth and the universe.
Research has been done by several creation organizations,
as well as independent scientists,
in order to answer such questions.
The evidence actually shows that coal does not take millions of years to form,
as is commonly asserted.
In fact,
the formation of coal has been proven to be a rapid process that can be duplicated in modern laboratories in a matter of days - or even hours.

I.
Rapid Formation
In order for coal to be formed,
several factors must be present.
Pressure,
temperature,
water,
time,
and some sort of vegetation are the key elements for the formation of coal.
According to evolutionary theory,
the slow accumulation and decomposition of vegetation living in past ages accounts for the coal seams.
However,
this theory can not answer why such large amounts of original vegetation without soil can be found in the areas that are now coal seams,
or how these coal seams became so thick - some being over two hundred feet in depth.

Scientist Robert Gentry analyzed coalified wood found on the Colorado Plateau
in order to determine how long it took for coal to form.
1 By treating coal with epoxy and slicing it into thin sheets,
Dr.
Gentry was able to examine tiny,
compressed radiohalos found in the coal.
Radiohalos are discolorations in the coal,
ejected by radioactive elements in the centers (such as uranium).


According to evolutionary theory,
in order for these halos to form,
several processes must have occurred.
First,
water-saturated logs must have been laid down in several different geologic formations,
including the Triassic,
Jurassic and Eocene layers.
Later,
uranium solutions infiltrated the water-saturated logs,
and uranium decay products were collected at tiny sites within the logs.
The radioactive decay from the tiny particles ejected spherical radiation damage regions around those sites,
thus producing halos.
Finally,
a pressure event on the site
of the formations compressed the logs as well as the radioactive halos within them.
However,
because coal is not a malleable substance,
scientists know that these logs had not turned to coal at the time the compression event occurred.
This points to a quick burial and coalification of the logs
– rather than a long time period.
2
II.
Decay Ratios

When the ratio of uranium decay to its decay product (lead) is analyzed,
the conclusion is drawn that all the logs within the various geologic formations were buried at the same time.
The high lead-to-uranium ratios admit the possibility that both the initial uranium infiltration
and the coalification could possibly have occurred within the past several thousand years.
3
III.
Polystrate Fossils

The presence of "polystrate" trees
(trees petrified or coalified in an upright position) point to a rapid coalification process.
One of the most commonly known polystrate trees is found at Katherine Hill Bay,
Australia.
This fossilized tree can be seen extending over twelve feet,
through several sedimentary layers.
According to evolutionary theory the different sedimentary
layers took hundreds of thousands of years to accumulate.
However,
we know this is impossible since the tree would
have decomposed long before the sediments would have had time to accumulate.
Rather,
this tree is testimony to the catastrophic and rapid burial that must have taken place.
IV.
Unsullied Deposits Finally,
coal seams such as those found in the Powder River Basin of Gillette,
Wyoming,
ranging from 150 to 200 feet in depth,
point to a rapid coalification process.
"These coal seams run remarkably thick and unsullied by other material.
Usually,
unwanted sediments,
such as clay,
washes over a deposit before coal seams can get very thick.
This leaves scientists with the baffling question of how the seams get so massive
and still remain undiluted by influxes of clay and other impurities before they thicken.
"4
Conclusion

The answer can be found in the Biblical account of Noah's Flood.
The Biblical description of the fountains of the great deep breaking up gives strong
reference to volcanic activity in the pre-Flood basins 5
This would have provided several of the key factors need for the production of coal,
along with an explanation of how the process could have occurred at such a rapid pace.
Although the coalification process has been used in the past to support theories of an aged universe,
research done by leading creation scientists reveals that this process actually supports creation teachings of a young Earth.
Physical evidence demonstrates that the coalification process must have occurred rapidly,
rather than over vast time periods.
CEM Staff Writer
1Robert V.
Gentry,
Video:
Young Age of the Earth
2Ibid.

3Science ,
October 15,
1996
4Earth Magazine,
May 1993
5Genesis,
chapter seven
[ Coal:
Evidence/Young Earth | Evidence for Creation
| Magnetic Field | Created Earth | Macroevolution | Mammoths |
Carbon Dating | Evidence for Creation-2 | Scientific Allusions in Scripture ] http://www.creationevidence.org
***************************************.
Creation Model
Session One
Our creation model begins,
not with the space-time dimension,
but with the Creator Himself.
George Ellis,
co-author of The Large Scale Structure of Time Space stated,
"The construction of nature points to a purposeful designer".
Can we identify the God of creation?
We believe we can identify Him both Biblically,
and scientifically.
In studying the man-made religions of the world,
ancient creation myths,
and pagan deities,
there are found common tenets that express the characteristics of their gods.
These include:
Man leaving earth and becoming deity ,
Plural deities in conflict with each other ,
Sensuous preoccupation ,
Creation by naturalistic means ,
Exploration of the creation by the gods ,
Sacrifice by murder ,
Only one creation concept is unique in not sharing these characteristics,
and that is the account of creation as told in the Holy Bible.
The God of the Bible is the only God that satisfies man's own observation of what life teaches him.
Knowledge shows that the "First Cause of Creation" or "The Creator" OF:
Limitless space,
Ending time,
Perpetual motion,
Infinite complexity,
Consciousness,
Feeling,
Will,
Ethical values,
Religion,
Beauty,
System of Justice,
Righteousness,
Love,
Life,


MUST BE:
Infinite in His nature,
Eternal in His duration,
Omnipotent in power,
Omniscient in intelligence,
Personal,
Emotional,
Volitional,
Moral,
Spiritual,
Aesthetic,
Just,
Holy,
Loving,
Living,
Reference:
Morris,
Henry.
1985.
Many Infallible Proofs (Master Books,
El Cajon,
CA) p.
103 The great philosophic questions of life that have been asked by all cultures are as follows:
Who Am I?

Where Did I Come From?

What Is My Purpose Here?

Where Am I Going?


These can be addressed by the study of the "First Cause of creation"
-The Creator Himself.
Is it possible that the Creator originally designed the earth to benefit
the one He would ultimately create on the final sixth day of the literal week of creation?
We say yes,
it is possible.
This one - MAN - would be created in the image of his Creator,
to fulfill His purpose,
and to be in charge of the creation.
This original creation with its protective firmamental canopy,
supporting internal infrastructure,
and myriad life forms would be an environment in which man could flourish.
Protective Firmamental Canopy

Receiving the short wave energy from stellar bodies
Amplifying the mid-spectral light
Filtering out harmful ultraviolet radiation
Causing increased atmospheric pressure
Causing increased oxygen ratio
Supporting Internal Infrastructure
Core keeping the electromagnetic field oriented
Radioactive elements giving off nuclear radiation and thermal energy
Band of asphalt hydrocarbons moderating
and sustaining the constant temperature of the energy
Great waters transporting that energy through aqueducts to the earth's surface Myriad Life Forms

Plants:
Fruit on the vine and seed in the fruit
Animals:
All creatures,
including dinosaurs,
coexisting with man
Man:
Superior intelligence immediate youth and functional maturity
We find the Creator the
"First Cause of creation" described in Genesis 1:
1 "In the beginning God"
[ Session Two ]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Hawking,
Stephen W.
,
Ellis,
George F.
R.
,
The Cosmic Black-Body Radiation and the Existence and Singularities in our Universe:
Astrophysical Journal;
152,
1968,
pp 25-26
Encyclopedia Britannica,
Ancient European:
Religions;
15th Ed.
,
Vol.
18,
p 789,
p 794
Encyclopedia Britannica,
Middle Eastern Religions:
15th Ed.
,
Vol.
24,
p 89
Encyclopedia Britannica,
Religious Doctrines and Dogmas:
15th Ed.
,
Vol.
17,
p 370
Morris,
Henry M.
,
Many Infallible Proofs:
Master Books;
El Cajon,
CA.
,
1985,
p 103
Baugh,
Carl E.
,
Creation In Symphony - The Model:
Creation Evidence Museum
http://www.creationevidence.org
*************************************.
Creation Model
Session Eight

The voice of God (whether by direct vocal intervention or by indirect vibrational disruption)
at microwave energy level penetrated the great water reservoir beneath the earth's granite crust.
With microwave's unique effect on water,
this agitated medium rapidly disrupted the planet's subterranean structure
which housed the designed nuclear reactors and internal foundations.
The violent heated waters ruptured the granite crust
and sent hot jets of steam upward through the thin firmament suspended above the earth.
This action opened channel windows in the crystalline canopy and caused its collapse.
The mass fell as liquid rain in the temperate zones and dropped as ice at the poles.
Subsequent expulsion of water and chemical elements
from earth's disrupted interior saturated the surface floods and trapped living organisms as fossils in sedimentary deposits.
Gravitational attraction of the moon brought the global body of floodwaters into resonance.
Cyclical tidal action deposited organic and inorganic materials into conformable sedimentary layers.
The vast majority of the "geologic column" is adequately explained by a single year of global flood activity.
[ Session Seven | Session Nine ]
http://www.creationevidence.org
****************************************.
Creation Model
Session Eleven

The ocean floor has expanded,
and earthquakes continue to release pressures from a violent internal structure below Earth's crust.
Surface temperatures range in extremes,
while ice buildup has extended beyond the poles.
Loss of the firmamental canopy left the geomagnetic field without a charging mechanism.
The ozone canopy,
which built up after the Flood,
is losing its stability due to depletion of energy in the magnetic field.
As we approach tribulation,
the Creator will appear for an instant in the air.
His radiant energy will increase the strength of the magnetic field.
As tribulation progresses extreme earthquakes and violent eruptions
will reshape the planetary surface and emit an overcast of dust particles in the upper atmosphere.
Radiation judgments will further increase the strength of the magnetic field.
Buildup of massive hailstones on a global scale will purify the upper atmosphere and leave water suspended in the concentrated lines of flux.

The geomagnetic field will then hold sufficient strength to break measured amounts of water into oxygen and hydrogen by natural electrolysis.
[ Session Ten | Session Twelve ]
http://www.creationevidence.org
*****************************************.
Creation Model
Session Five
On day five the vast ocean,
fingering seas,
and open skies loomed without inhabitant.
So God created fish and fowl to plummet the sea,
search the sky,
and occupy the earth.
Flying insects and marine reptiles were brought forth as well.
On day six dinosaurs,
reptiles,
and mammals were created.
Man was then introduced in the creation over which he was to rule,
designed by the Creator in whose image he was made.
As the Creator made man an extension of himself,
He then created woman from a rib near man's heart - genetically identified with Adam.
She was an extension of man,

and yet,
in her own right a complete and separate being,
capable of specific comprehension,
unique expression,
and voluntary companionship.
She was physically,
mentally,
and emotionally endowed with a reflection of the charm and beauty embodied in the whole creation.
Eve possessed a grace and sensitivity unmatched by any other of God's perfect creatures - in short,
a "mate" in all its ramifications and a "help" in its sublimest sense.
[ Session Four | Session Six ]
http://www.creationevidence.org
***************************************.
Creation Model
Session Nine

The physical dimensions of the Ark lend themselves to optimal marine survival.
In laboratory experiments the six-to-one (length-to-width) ratio of the vessel keeps it upright,
with the waves running along its side (causing it to consistently turn toward the waves).
The structural design of the vessel was of "gopher",
providing "structural inter-lamination" of each component with every other component.
The natural hydrocarbon resin ("pitch") obtained from trees was used as an adhesive,
in conjunction with spaced wooden pegs.
Space on the Ark was adequate to house representatives of every kind.
Verifying studies include extinct and extant life forms.
[ Session Eight | Session Ten ]
http://www.creationevidence.org
************************************.
Creation Model
Session Seven
Into this sublime habitat God introduced man
- to comprehend its works,
to correlate its products,
and to communicate with its Creator.
Audibilized radio signals transmitted the music of the spheres each morning,
heralding the harmonic symphony of all creation.
A mist rose from the effects of this music,
vibrating crystals of sand in the water table.
An optimal geomagnetic field charged the waters,
energizing living systems.
Adequate atmospheric pressure enabled dinosaurs to reach full stature,
which in turn enabled them to keep luxuriant vegetation in check.
Moderate temperatures bathed the globe,

and warm thermal springs encouraged the growth of vegetation.
Magenta hues added to the stimulation,
and aerating worms interacted the soil and atmosphere.
[ Session Six | Session Eight ]
http://www.creationevidence.org
*****************************.
Creation Model
Session Six
The harmonic creation was established to endure forever.
A crystalline firmament suspended above the planet filtered out short-wave radiation,
and with its physical structure in place universal radio signals serenaded the earth with morning melodies.
Planets in the Solar System were distributed at harmonic intervals on a large scale,
consistent with the energy fields living seeds produce on a small scale.
The radiant sun transformed and ruled the day,
and its glowing energy extending into the firmament illuminated the night.
The reflecting moon added a romantic invitation to the sky.
The stars produced measurable references by which time could be told;
their colors and formations were as varied and imaginative as eternal reflection could appreciate.
[ Session Five | Session Seven ]

http://www.creationevidence.org
******************************.
Creation Model
Session Ten
Early in the Flood sequence subterranean waters erupted
and ruptured the great Pangean supercontinent into continental divisions,
but the continental divisions were still in place adjacent to each other.
During the year of that great Flood the global floodwaters laid down sedimentary layers of rock laced with fossils.
These sedimentary layers were placed directly over many of the fracture lines.
The Pangean supercontinent was still in place,
but was "fractured at the seams.
" Approximately five hundred years after the Flood a "runaway"
nuclear reaction took place in Earth's interior under the South Pacific basin.
This reaction was initiated originally as a result of the disruption which caused the Flood.
This "runaway" nuclear reaction took place at the time of Peleg,
and during his lifetime the diameter of the earth expanded
- separating the continents and thrusting great masses of land into new configurations.

[ Session Nine | Session Eleven ] http://www.
creationevidence.org/cemframes.html ************************************.
Creation Model
Session Three
In response to the Creator's expression of energy,
the concentrated hydrogen in the magnetic canopy bonded into crystalline lattice among the water molecules.
A thin,
solid firmament was thus created,
suspended by its own superconductivity as a canopy over the watery Earth.
Its natural physical properties permitted mid-spectral and long-wave radiation to be transmitted and photo-multiplied.
Shorter wavelengths of radiation were assimilated into the magnetic field,
providing a mechanism of re-supply for use by living systems yet to be created.
Radio wavelengths were intermittently audibilized,
and areas of the watery mass danced in activating response.
[ Session Two | Session Four ]
http://www.creationevidence.org
*********************************.
Creation Model
Session Twelve
The return of the Creator in His glory will produce radiant physical energy,
bonding the hydrogen and water suspended above the earth.
This phenomenon will reintroduce the firmament,
and dinosaurs will flourish again.
Elimination of ultraviolet radiation and reintroduction of magenta glow will give vegetation opportunity for optimal genetic expression.
The crystalline firmament will again provide physical characteristics to
receive and audibilize the harmonic radio signals from space for the musical benefit of Earth's inhabitants.
This Kingdom reign will lead into the final judgment.
Subsequently the new Heaven will suspend itself over the restored Earth.
Symphonic righteousness will dwell in the heavens,
and we will enjoy our Creator for eternity.
[ Session Eleven | Session Thirteen ]
http://www.creationevidence.org
************************************.
Creation Model
Session Two
In the beginning God created the heavens (space-time dimension) and the earth.
And the earth was without form and void.
When first created,
the earth was simply a mass of water.
By calling it earth,
the inference is that the Creator had futuristic intentions with design and purpose.
Beginning with water,
we have the basic elements of earth's reactions,
and the essential ingredient of life's processes.
In water you have the integration of hydrogen and oxygen.
The problem of transmutation of elements is solved with water.
Between elements no.
6 and elements no.
7 on the periodic chart there cannot be a transmutation.
By creating elements no.
1 and no.
8 first,
there is the futuristic possibility for the energy and elements to be transmutated to whatever the Creator would like to create in His design and purpose.
The earth was void and without form;
there was just water.
It did not have a surface form.
That would be created on day three of creation.
On day one of creation the Spirit of God would move on the watery mass and thus generate a sphere.
Current thoughts on the physical sciences indicate with a small structure of the earth and with lines of space being curved,
you actually have an integration of phenomena -time,
space,
and energy.
In the creation model,
there is the space/time dimension,
called the heavens (plural) and a sphere of water.
That is plausible according to our current understanding of the physical sciences.
When the spirit of God moved over the body of water,
energy was expressed for a specific purpose.
The water molecule,
H2O,
is a unique combination of elements,
which include:

- A negative and positive pole

- A charge

- Its own tiny electromagnetic field

- In random tendency

- Be solid,
liquid,
or gas

By adding energy and specific motion to a watery mass,
it takes on a spherical shape.
The water molecules align,
and a global electromagnetic field is formed.
There is super charged water in the lines of electromagnetic energy.
At the surface where the greatest concentration of energy is located,
normal electrolysis would occur,
breaking the H2O bond and allowing for free hydrogen and free oxygen.
(Electromagnetic energy around bodies of water produces free hydrogen.
) The moving of the Spirit of God would have caused free hydrogen,
free oxygen,
and an electromagnetic field.

This first day of creation is a literal solar day,
yet it accounts for the deep penetration of matter and energy into space,
the interpretation of vast amounts of light years in space,
and the arrival of information in light waves sent back to earth.
The entire creation took place about 6000 years ago.
(More information on the space/time dimension and "what is a day" in further lessons)
In the space/time dimension we recognize that throughout the universe there is a trinity.
In space you have height,
length,
and width.
In time you have past,
present,
and future.
In matter you have energy, motion,
and phenomena. Yet,
the cosmos is intrastructured.
God said,
"Let there be light".
Although we disagree with the old-age timeline even evolutionary astrophysicists state that,
"all physical phenomena could have come from light".
UCLA laboratory experiments have demonstrated that under certain conditions,
light is formed when sound is broadcast through water.
God would stretch out the heavens during the first week of creation and again during the time of Noah's Flood.
The earth was still experiencing six literal solar days.
[ Session One | Session Three ]

--------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
1 Genesis 1: 1-2
2 Fowler,
William A.; The Origins of the Elements:
Scientific American,
Sept.1956, Vol.
195, p.82
3 Ross,
Hugh;
A Super Theory of Superstrings Reveals a Super Creator:
Reasons to Believe,
Vol. 9 no. 4, 1995, p.3
4 Humphreys, Russel D.;
The Creation of the Earth's Magnetic Field :
Creation Research Society Quarterly, San Diego,
Vol. 20, p.89
5 Humphreys, Russel D.;
The Creation of the Earth's Magnetic Field:
Creation Research Society Quarterly,
San Diego, Vol. 20, p.89
6 Linsky, Jeffery;
CU Researchers Discover Wall Around Solar System:
Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics,
Daily Camera,
Boulder CO, Jan. 17, 1996
7 Genesis 1:3
8 Weisskopf,
Victor F.;
The origin of the Universe:
American Scientist, Vol.71, 1983, p.480
9 Space Between Stars Contains Atoms & Molecules of all the Elements:
Discover, Sept.1993, p.24
10 Weinberg,
Stephen; Life in the Universe:
Scientific American,
Oct. 1994,
p.44
11Putterman, Seth;
Sonoluminesence:
Sound into Light:
Scientific American,
Feb. 1995, p.46
12 Kennedy, James D.;
Is God Trying to Tell Us Something?:
Charisma & Christian Life,
Nov.
1988,p.83
13 Humphreys, D.
Russel;
Starlight & Time:
Master Books, Colorado Springs, Co. 1994

http://www.creationevidence.org
**********************************.
Dr. Carl Baugh
Creation in the 21st Century
Hosted by Dr. Carl Baugh,
the foremost doctor on creation science.
Presenting scientific evidence for creation and design by a personal creator.
You can visit the website at
www.
creationevidence.org

If you like this show,
you may also like:
Pastor John Hagee
Kirk Cameron
Billy Graham
Tommy Tenney
Dr. Myles Munroe


Welcome to ,
cemframes.
html?
FPRIVATE "TYPE=PICT;
ALT=CEM Online" cemframes.
htmlthe web site of the Creation Evidence Museum in Glen Rose,
T exas.
As you browse our pages you will receive educational information presenting scientific evidence for creation and design by a personal Creator.
This scientifically chartered museum was established in July of 1984 for the purpose of research,
excavation,
and display of scientific evidence for creation.
The Museum's team,
led by its Founder and Director,
Carl Baugh,
Ph.
D.
,
has excavated eleven dinosaurs (Acrocanthosaurus,
Stegosaurus,
Allosaurus,
etc.
),
475 dinosaur tracks,
86 human footprints,
7 cat prints,
and other fossil remains
- all in Cretaceous limestone.
Excavations were professionally documented along the Paluxy River and various other international locations.
Among museums this entity makes a unique contribution,
demonstrating that man and dinosaur lived contemporaneously.
Educators,
professors,
children,
and adherents to various religions are finding answers to the great questions of life:
Who am I?
,
Where did I come from?
,
What is my purpose here?
,
and Where am I going?
In its ongoing research to find answers to Who is God?
,
Was the Universe designed and created by a Creator?
,
and What do the Bible and Science teach about the heavens,
man,
animals,
plants,
etc?
,
the Museum researches and houses artifacts from archaeology,
geology,
and paleontology (such as the London artifact,
the Meister Print,
the cup in coal,
the fossilized foot in a boot,
the fossilized human finger,
and others).
This original research contributes significant information to the controversy between the theories of life origins,
namely creation vs evolution.
The Museum's research involves experimentation and simulation of Earth's original pre-Flood environment in the world's first hyperbaric biosphere.
Various teaching aids,
books,
videos,
tapes,
and other resources are available through the Museum.

A tremendous pyramid of evidence for design and recent creation is available for detailed study.
Romans 1:20 states:
"For the invisible things of him from the creation are clearly seen,
being understood by the things that are made,
even his eternal power and Godhead:
so that they are without excuse.
" Scientific evidence for creation abounds in areas of objective observation.
Scholars in various scientific disciplines have written about the incredible complexity in living systems and the structure of the universe.
This complexity is beyond the possibility of natural development.
In the panel to the right,
we begin with a brief summary of the Creation in Symphony Model by our Director.
• Coal:
Evidence for a Young Earth" Evolutionary theory requires millions of years in the formation of coal in order to afford time for the development of living organisms whose fossils.
.
.
CONTINUE
• Evidence for Creation (10 brief reasons)
The Fossil Record...
Evolutionists have constructed the Geologic Column
in order to illustrate the supposed progression of "primitive"...
CONTINUE
• The Earth's Magnetic Field Many people know that the earth has a magnetic field,
but few are aware that this field is shrinking.
This decrease has been measured over a period of 150 years.
.
.
CONTINUE • Our Created Earth:
Uniquely Designed for Life
Of all the lessons which the Earth continually teaches us,
perhaps the most obvious.
.
.
CONTINUE
• Scientific Problems With Macroevolution:
(Karl Popper's definition of the scientific method )...
CONTINUED
• Mammoths The largest quantities of woolly mammoth remains are found in Arctic and sub-arctic.
.
.
CONTINUED
• Carbon Dating A less-common form of the carbon atom,
carbon-14,
is used today by scientists.
.
.
CONTINUED • Evidence for Creation • Scientific Allusions in Scripture Various aspects of the creation model such as the effects of the electromagnetic field,
pink light,
ultraviolet filtration,
energized water,
etc.
have been incorporated into various products ( pink eyeglasses,
energized water and stun guns)
being sold to the general public.
.
.
more info.
.
.

A Moment in History...
That a maker is required for anything that is made is a lesson Sir Isaac Newton
was able to teach forcefully to an atheist-scientist friend of his.
Sir Isaac had an accomplished artisan fashion for him a small scale
model of our solar system which was to be put in a room in Newton’s home when completed.
The assignment was finished and installed on a large table.
The workman had done a very commendable job,
simulating not only the various sizes of the planets and their relative proximities,
but also so constructing the model that everything rotated and orbited when a crank was turned.
It was an interesting,
even fascinating work,
as you can image,
particularly to anyone schooled in the sciences.
Newton’s atheist-scientist friend came by for a visit.
Seeing the model,
he was naturally intrigued,
and proceeded to examine it with undisguised admiration for the high quality of the workmanship.
‘My! What an exquisite thing this is!
’ he exclaimed.
‘Who made it?
’ Paying little attention to him,
Sir Isaac answered, ‘Nobody.
’ Stopping his inspection,
the visitor turned and said:
‘Evidently you did not understand my question.
I asked who made this.
Newton,
enjoying himself immensely no doubt,
replied in a still more serious tone.
‘Nobody.
What you see just happened to assume the form it now has.
’ ‘You must think I am a fool!
’ the visitor retorted heatedly,
‘Of course somebody made it,
and he is a genius,
and I would like to know who he is.
’ Newton then spoke to his friend in a polite yet firm way:
‘This thing is but a puny imitation of a much grander system whose laws you know,
and I am not able to convince you that this mere toy is without a designer and maker;
yet you profess to believe that the great original from which the design is taken has come into being without either designer or maker!
Now tell me by what sort of reasoning do you reach such an incongruous conclusion?
’ Sir Isaac Newton Solar System Story (from the book:
‘The Truth:
God or evolution?
’ by Marshall and Sandra Hall,
Baker Book House,
Grand Rapids, MI)
*****************************************.
EVIDENCE FOR CREATION (as compiled by Creation Evidence Museum - Dr.
Carl Baugh) THE FOSSIL RECORD Evolutionists have constructed the Geologic Column in order to illustrate the supposed progression of “primitive” life forms to “more complex” systems we observe today.
Yet,
“since only a small percentage of the earth’s surface obeys even a portion of the geologic column…the claim of their having taken place to form a continuum of rock/life/time…over the earth is therefore a fantastic and imaginative contrivance.
"(1) “The lack of transitional series cannot be explained as being due to the scarcity of material.
The deficiencies are real,
they will never be filled.
” (2) This supposed column is actually saturated with “polystrate fossils” (fossils extending from one geologic layer to another) that tie all the layers to one time-frame.
“To the unprejudiced,
the fossil record of plants is in favor of special creation.
” (3) 1.
John Woodmorappe,
“The Essential Non-Existence of the Evolutionary Uniformitarian Geologic Column.
2.
H. Heribert Nilsson,
as quoted in Arthur C. Custance,
THE EARTH BEFORE MAN, Part II
3. E.J.H. Corner,
CONTEMPORARY BOTANICAL THOUGHT
DECAY OF EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD


Dr. Thomas Barnes,
Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of Texas at El Paso,
has published the definitive work in this field.
(4) Scientific observations since 1829 have shown that the earth’s magnetic field
has been measurably decaying at an exponential rate,
demonstrating its half-life to be approximately 1400 years.
In practical application its strength 20000 years ago
would approximate that of a magnetic star.
Under those conditions many of the atoms necessary for life processes could not form.
These data demonstrate that earth’s entire history is young,
within a few thousand years.
4.
Thomas Barnes,
ICR Technical Monograph #4,
ORIGIN AND DESTINY OF THE EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD.
THE GLOBAL FLOOD
The Biblical record clearly describes a global Flood during Noah’s day.
Additionally,
there are hundreds of flood traditions handed down through cultures all over the world.
(5) M.
E.
Clark and Henry Voss have demonstrated the scientific validity of such
a Flood providing the sedimentary layering we see on every continent.
(6) Secular scholars report very rapid sedimentation and periods of great carbonate deposition in earth’s sedimentary layers.
(7) It is now possible to prove the historical reality of the Biblical Flood.
(8) 5.
Edward Blick, A SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS OF GENESIS;
p. 103

6.M.E. Clark and H.D. Voss,
FLUID MECHANIC EXAMINATION
OF THE TIAL MECHANISM FOR PRODUCING MEGA-SEDIMANTARY LAYERING.
7.Derek Ager, THE NATURE OF THE STRATIGRAPHICAL RECORD,
p. 43 and p. 86
8. John Anthony West,
SERPENT IN THE SKY:
THE HIGH WISDOM OF ANCIENT EGYPT, pp 13-14
RADIO HALOS
Physicist Robert Gentry has reported isolated radio halos of plonium-214 in crystalline granite.
The half-life of this element is 0.000164 seconds!
To record the existence of this element in such short time span,
the granite must be in crystalline state instantaneously.
(10) This runs counter to evolutionary estimates of 300 million years for granite to form.
(10) Robert Gentry –CREATIONN’S TINY MYSTERY)
HUMAN ARTIFACTS THROUGHOUT THE GEOLOGIC COLUMN
Man-made artifacts – such as the hammer in Cretaceous rock,
a human sandal print with trilobite in Cambrian rock,
human footprints and a handprint in Cretaceous rock
– point to the fact that all the supposed geologic
periods actually occurred at the same time in the recent past.
(11) (11) Carl Baugh,
Ph D –WHY DO MEN BELIEVE EVOLUTION ...
AGAINST ALL ODDS?

[ Coal:
Evidence/Young Earth | Evidence for Creation | Magnetic Field |
Created Earth | Macroevolution | Mammoths | Carbon Dating |
Evidence for Creation-2 | Scientific Allusions in Scripture ]

http://www.creationevidence.org
********************************.
MAMMOTHS
by Robert F.
Helfinstine
Vita:
BSEE,
1950 University of Minnesota
U.
S.
Navy Commission as electronic specialist,
1951
Honeywell, Inc. 40 years in design and development of automatic controls for aircraft and spacecraft.
Lead systems engineer on E1B/S2F automatic control system,
lead systems engineer on Apollo command module control system – in addition to various aircraft and spacecraft systems.
Independent research in ancient history,
archaeology and dating techniques.
Participation in excavation activities in Glen Rose,
Texas and Hanson Ranch,
Wyoming. President,
Twin Cities Creation Science Association.
Author of TEXAS TRACKS and ARTIFACTS.

Abstract:
The secular view of mammoths centers on an Ice Age environment and extinction some 10000 years ago.
Some creationists view the mammoth remains as evidence from Noah's Flood.
These large animals could never live in an Arctic environment such as we find in Siberia and northern Alaska,
primarily because there is no food supply compatible with their needs.
Scientific studies of these animals lead to the conclusions that they were from a temperate climate,
there was a mass extinction of many of them,
and many were buried along with trees and other vegetation after
which the land became frozen by a sudden and permanent climate change.
The cause of the extinction and burial appears to be a brief
but massive flow of water from a post-Flood disturbance to the earth.

Introduction
The largest quantities of woolly mammoth remains are found in Arctic and sub-arctic locations.
They had long hair and underwool,
and those found with meat still on their bones showed a heavy layer of fat under the skin.
From this evidence the secular view of mammoths is that these large animals,
by evolutionary processes,
were adapted to living in a cold climate.
The frozen remains were attributed to the hazards of living in such a climate.
But from earliest scientific studies of these animals,
a different picture emerges.
I.
Characteristics
Early research proved that the mammoth was distinct from modern elephants.
Although related,
it is a closer relative to the Asian elephant than the African elephant based on blood tests.
It was not a tropical beast,
neither was it adapted to living in the Arctic.
Adaptation is supposedly based on thick skin,
long fur and underwool,
and fat deposits under the skin.
Mammoth skin,
essentially identical to that of the Indian elephant,
does not have oil glands.
Fur without oil glands is adaptation to a warm climate.
The fat layer is not for insulation,
but an indication of an adequate food supply.
Preserved food found in the mouths and stomachs of several specimens contained temperate climate grasses which do not grow in the Arctic today,
but 2000 kilometers farther south.
Temperate climate plants and animals go together.
The companions of the mammoth were woolly rhinoceros,
bison,
sheep,
horses,
bears,
lions and deer.
II.
Climate Conditions The climate of Siberia and northern Alaska during the time of the mammoths was not the same as the present climate.
Even Charles Lyell concluded that the mammoth Arctic climate was much warmer than it is today.
The present tundra mosses and grasses which grow only about eight to ten weeks of the year are unpalatable and even toxic to large herbivores.
Mammoths would be living in a practical desert under the present conditions.
Large rooted trunks of trees are found in beds containing mammoths.
Large trees cannot grow over permafrost.
Animals living with the mammoths,
horses and bison,
could not have endured the mires of Arctic summer which make travel almost impossible.
III.
How Did Mammoths Die?
Some modern ideas of how mammoths died include falling into ice crevasses,
falling over a cliff in a storm,
falling through thin ice or being buried by a landslide.
Scientific analysis of bodies and other remains in the tundra provide the following information.
Remains are for the most part just bones scattered about and piled together with trees,
volcanic ash,
vegetation and bones of other animals.
Some animals were torn apart by violent action.
Animals with preserved flesh are buried in the frozen tundra near its upper surface and usually at higher elevations.
Decay began before the bodies were frozen,
but once frozen they never thawed until exposed by erosion or excavation.
The animals died suddenly in the late summer as indicated by food found in their stomach or mouth.
Frozen mammoth remains and other animal remains increase in number the farther north one goes in Siberia,
being most numerous in the New Siberian Islands.
The probable cause of the death of so many animals is described by H.
H.
Howorth.

"A great catastrophe occurred by which the mammoth and its companions were overwhelmed over a large part of the earth.
This catastrophe involved a brief but widespread rush
of water which not only killed the animals but also buried them under continuous beds of loam and gravel.
" IV.
Dating the Catastrophe

The big question is "When did it happen?
" Based on Biblical history,
the event happened after the Flood of Noah.
Not all people agree with this conclusion.
But there were other effects of the orientation change.
Great tidal waves were reported by the Chinese and North American Indians.
The Sahara dried out and became a desert.
Its present condition appears to have begun after 2000 B.
C.
The Tarim basin in China was once populated with cities and settlements and forests.
Now it is mostly desert.
There is evidence that India,
Pakistan and Iran all had abundant rainfall before the climate changed.
Large areas of former agricultural land on the India-Pakistan border are now desert.
American deserts once had abundant rainfall based on pollen and tree remnants found at archaeological sites.
All the world's deserts seem to have started about 3500 years ago.
This is the same period identified by Charles Ginenthal for the extinction of the mammoths.
It is also the time of the exodus of the Israelites from Egypt.
References 1.Stewart,
J.M.,
Frozen Mammoths from Siberia bring Ice Ages to vivid life,
SMITHSONIAN, Vol 8 No.
9, Dec. 1977
2.Hapgood,
C.H.,
The Extinction of the Mammoths and the Mastodons,
Ch. 10,
The Path of the Pole 3.Howorth,
H.
H.
,
The Mammoth and the Flood,
London 1887 4.Farrand, W.R.,
Frozen Mammoths and Modern Geology,
SCIENCE, 17 March 1961,
5.Dillow, J.C.,
The Riddle of the Frozen Giants, Ch. 10,
The Waters Above, 1982
6.Ginenthal, Charles, The Extinction of the Mammoth, The Velikovskian,
Vol III, Nos. 2,3, 1997
[ Coal:
Evidence/Young Earth | Evidence for Creation | Magnetic Field |
Created Earth | Macroevolution | Mammoths | Carbon Dating |
Evidence for Creation-2 | Scientific Allusions in Scripture ]
http://www.creationevidence.org
***********************************************.
Our Created Earth:
Uniquely Designed for Life by David V.
Bassett,
M.
S.
,
CEM Staff Writer "Speak to the Earth,
and it shall teach thee;
.
.
.
Who knoweth not in all these that the hand of the LORD hath wrought this?
"
Job 12:
8a,
9 Of all the lessons which the Earth continually teaches us,
perhaps the most obvious and profound is that it alone among the worlds framed by the Word of God (Heb.
11:
3) is divinely crafted,
sculpted,
and engineered to sustain life.
In fact the more we learn about our solar system and the universe,
the more unique our Earth becomes.
As home to over one million different species of life,
each with its own special criteria for survival,
the Earth repeatedly reinforces the fact that God orchestrated each detail necessary for terrestrial existence.
"For thus saith the LORD Who created the heavens,
God Himself Who formed the Earth and made it;
He hath established it,
He created it not in vain,
He formed it to be inhabited;
I am the LORD,
and there is none else.
" Isaiah 45:
18

The Creator's matchless formula for life on Earth involves a multitude of planetary
parameters working together in a specific and delicate balance.
So precise is this prescription,
a mere absence or slight alteration in any one of the countless interrelated
factors and mutually-dependent variables upon which life hinges could prove cataclysmic.
Consider these more noticeable requirements upon which all life on our world depends:
(1) Abundance of Liquid Water --- This flowing treasure is unique in the combination of physical and chemical properties it manifests as the only possible solvent and medium for living cells.
More than 70% of the planet is covered by some 326 million cubic miles of liquid water,
enough to submerge a perfectly smooth and spherical Earth to a depth of 8,500 feet (over 1.6 miles!).
[Gen. 1:2, 10b / Job 38:34 / Ps. 33:7 / Rev.14:7b; see also Gen.7:10 & Ps. 104:6]

(2) Cleansing Ocean Tides --- The ebb and flow of Earth's tidal circulation
(in response to the lunar gravitational pull)
purifies the world ocean and the continental shorelines which serve to enclose its waters.
[Prov.
8:29a / Job 26:10; 38:11 / Ps. 104:9]
(3) Ideal Planetary Size and Mass --- With an equatorial diameter of 7,
927 miles (Job 38:
18 / Isa.
40:
22a)
and a mass equal to nearly 6.
588 sextillion (10 ^ 23 = billion trillion) tons,
the Earth is able to provide the perfect gravitational attraction and optimum atmospheric pressure for living organisms.
[Job 28:
25 / !
sa.
40:
12]

(4) Life-Sustaining Atmosphere
--- It has been said of the Earth that "the existence of its inhabitants hangs upon
a thin and delicate sheath of gas that envelops the planet like the skin of an apple.
" Though over 99% of our atmosphere (composed of 78% nitrogen,
21% oxygen,
and 1% other gases) lies below 50 miles in altitude,
it still is able to (a) provide the necessary oxygen crucial for animal and human respiration,
(b) preserve acceptable temperature ranges while avoiding life-threatening extremes of heat and cold,
and (c) protect from incoming extraterrestrial debris and (UV) solar radiation.
[Gen.
1:
20b / Job 37:
18 / Ps.
104:3,13]
(5) Protective Magnetic Field --- Supplemented by the Van Allen radiation belts,
the ionosphere,
and the ozone layer as interior shields of defense,
the Earth's magnetic field not only protects us from cosmic bombardment of harmful particles and high-frequency waves,
it is also responsible for facilitating cellular communication and directional location.
[Prov.
8:
27;
cp.
Ps.
5:
12] (6) Proper Orbital Shape --- With a circumference of almost 600 million miles,
the Earth's orbit around the Sun is nearly circular in order to minimize extreme temperature variations.
[Ps.
19:
4b-6] (7) Perfect Orbital Radius --- Earth's 93 million-mile-average distance from the Sun (typically referred to as one astronomical unit or 1 A.
U.
)
allows our planet to have an ideal surface temperature of 58 degrees Fahrenheit
and an average ocean-water temperature of 45 degrees Fahrenheit.
In fact,
in terms of insolation (i.
e.
,
incoming solar radiation),
this orbital radius positions our world at the optimum location for life in the entire solar system.
[Gen.
1:
14-18 / Ps.
74:
16]
(8) Orbital Speed and Duration --- With an orbital period of exactly 365.
256 days,
which the Earth can accomplish by racing through space at an incredible 66,
600 mph (over 18 miles/sec !
!
),
our planet's seasonal length is conducive for agriculture.
[Gen.
1:
14] (9) Angle of Rotational Axis --- Also playing a role in Earth's favorable pattern of climate,
the 23.
5 degree tilt on its planetary axis permits the four annual seasons and,
in the northern hemisphere,
increases the amount of suitable land area and fertile soil needed for summer cultivation of crops.
[Gen.
8:
22 / Ps.
74:
17]
(10) Rate of Planetary Rotation --- Earth's sidereal day of 23 hours,
56 minutes,
4.
09 seconds allows for proper,
uniform heating and cooling of its spinning surface (Job 38:
14 / Gen.
8:
22),
as well as the re-circulation of its atmospheric winds and ocean currents in the global hydrologic cycle.
[Eccl.
1:
5-7 / Ps.
135:
7 / Isa.
55:
10]
The tolerances for life are extremely narrow,
and if there are any other planets in the universe,
it is very unlikely that any of them could have life,
due to the extremely rigid conditions necessary for life to exist.
The mathematical odds that all of these and other essential conditions happened by random chance are indeed astronomical --
in fact,
beyond all probability.
The ideal combination of prerequisites and requirements crucial to life observed only on Earth surely testifies to intelligent,
purposeful design.
"The LORD by wisdom hath founded the Earth;
by understanding hath He established the heavens.
" --- Prov.
3:
19
To believe that this beautifully balanced life-support system is a mere accident
requires invincible faith in the power of blind chance.
Would not any honest observer have to admit that the Earth alone
appears to have been designed for us to live on,
just as the psalmist said?
:
"The heaven,
even the heavens,
are the LORD's:
but the Earth hath He given to the children of men.
" ---Ps.
115:
16
[ Coal:
Evidence/Young Earth | Evidence for Creation | Magnetic Field |
Created Earth | Macroevolution | Mammoths | Carbon Dating | Evidence for Creation-2 | Scientific Allusions in Scripture ]
http://www.creationevidence.org
*****************************************.
SCIENTIFIC PROBLEMS WITH MACROEVOLUTION:
(Karl Popper's definition of the scientific method )
1.
OBSERVATION -steps of evolution have never been observed (Stebbins )
In the fossil recordwe view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study.
(Gould )
2.
EXPERIMENTATION -The processes would exceed the lifetime of any
human experimenter (Dobzhansky )
3.
REPRODUCTION impossible to reproduce in the laboratory.
(Dobshansky )
4.
FALSIFICATION -cannot be refuted thus outside empirical science.
(Ehrlich )
RESEARCH PROBLEMS WITH MACROEVOLUTION:
1.
ORIGINS -the chance of life originating from inorganic chemical elements
by natural means is beyond the realm of possibility (Hoyle )
2.
DEVELOPMENT -to produce a new organism from an existing life-form requires alterations
in the genetic material which are lethal to the organism (Maddox ) 3.
STASIS -enzymes in the cell nucleus repair errors in the DNA (Barton ) 4.
GEOLOGIC COLUMN -out-of-place artifacts have been found in earth's sedimentary
layers which disrupt the supposed evolutionary order (Corliss )
5.
DESIGN -irreducible complexity within the structure of the cell requires design (Denton, Behe ).

(DNA REPAIR:
The genome is reproduced very faithfully and there are enzymes
which repair the DNA,
where errors have been made or when the DNA is
damaged. - D.H.R. Barton,
Professor of Chemistry,
Texas A&M University,
Nobel Prize for Chemistry )
(CHANGE WITHIN GENETIC BOUNDARIES:
Microevolution does not lead beyond the confines of the species,
and the typical products of microevolution,
the geographic races,
are not incipient species.
There is no such category as incipient species. Richard B. Goldschmidt )
(MUTATION ACCUMULATIONS RELENTLESSLY FATAL:
Any random change in a complex,
specific,
functioning system wrecks that system.
And living things are the most complex functioning systems in the universe.
Science has now quantitated that a genetic mutation of as little as 1 billionth (0.
0000001%) of an
animal's genome is relentlessly fatal.
The genetic difference between human and his nearest relative,
the chimpanzee,
is at least 1.6% Calculated out that is a
gap of at least 48 million nucleotide differences that must be bridged by random
changes.
And a random change of only 3 nucleotides is fatal to an animal.
Geneticist Barney Maddox, 1992 )
[ Coal:
Evidence/Young Earth | Evidence for Creation | Magnetic Field |
Created Earth | Macroevolution | Mammoths | Carbon Dating | Evidence for Creation-2 | Scientific Allusions in Scripture ]
http://www.creationevidence.org
*******************************************.
The Earths Magnetic Field
Many people know that the earth has a magnetic field,
but few are aware that this field is shrinking.
This decrease has been measured over a period of 150 years,
and the rate of the decrease shows that something very earth-shaking took place less than 6000 years ago.
The fossil record contains evidence of great disturbances
in the field that give us an idea of the magnitude of the geologic events during Noah's flood.
This fact sheet answers some common questions on this subject,
beginning with basic questions about magnetism and ending with some current theories about geomagnetism.
What's a magnet?
Everyone knows what a magnet is,
or what a magnet does.
An invisible force (the magnetic field) attracts iron objects.
This force can be very strong.
A better question is
``Why does a magnet attract iron objects?
''.
For this we must take a look at what a magnet is made of.
If you take a bar magnet and break it in half,
you end up with two smaller bar magnets.
If you break the halves into fourths,
you get four small bar magnets.
If you have enough patience and time you can repeat this until you have millions of microscopic magnets.
All magnets have two poles;
a north pole and a south pole.
We call this a dipole (two poles).
Two north poles or south poles repel each other.
Try forcing the two north poles of two bar magnets together.
The unseen magnetic field makes it feel like there's a water balloon between them resisting your push.
Opposite poles (a north and a south) attract strongly.
How do you make a magnet?
Since opposite poles attract,
you can put two magnets together to make a larger magnet.
If you have many little magnets,
you can keep adding magnets into a larger mass and have one large,
strong magnet.
Some molecules,
some atoms,
and all electrons are little magnets.
So why isn't everything magnetic?
In most matter,
the molecules,
atoms,
and electrons are all jumbled up together.
In a strong magnet,
most of the little magnets
(magnetic domains if you want to get fancy) point in the same direction.
This makes the magnetic force of all the little magnets add up to make a large magnet,
called a permanent magnet.
Free magnets tend to align with each other.
You can try this by placing one magnet on a table and slowly moving another magnet toward it.
The magnet that is loose on the table turns to align with the magnet in your hand.
If you stroke a piece of iron with a magnet,
you gradually align the little magnetic domains,
and the result is a larger magnet.
Electric current is the flow of electrons through a conductor.
A conductor is a material that lets the electrons hop from atom to atom when influenced by an outside force.
If you move a wire (which is an electric conductor) through a magnetic field,
you force (induce) the electrons to travel in one direction through the wire.
Electrons flowing through a conductor create a magnetic field around the conductor.
This is called electromagnetism.
Can you ´unmake´ a magnet?
A stronger magnet can partially realign the magnetic domains of a weaker magnet.
Many different substances can be made into permanent magnets.
However,
for all these materials,
there is a critical temperature called the Curie point.
At this temperature or above,
the molecules within the material are moving around too much for the material to retain the magnetic alignment necessary to exhibit a magnetic field.
How big can a magnet be?
We live on a magnet.
The earth itself has a large magnetic field called the geomagnetic field.
You can see the effects of the field when you use a compass to find out which direction is north.
Earth's magnetic field is very complicated.
It can be thought of as being one large magnetic dipole with twelve more small magnets arranged at various angles.
A curious fact about Earth's magnetic field is that it is not lined up with the spin axis.
Its alignment is about 11 degrees off the axis defined by the north and south poles.
(Without knowing this,
you can't find the North pole using only a compass!
) What does Earth's magnetic field do for us?
The magnetic field helps us find our way around.
Using a compass,
we can tell which way is north even when there are no familiar landmarks in sight.
The magnetic field shields us from much harmful radiation.
Cosmic rays come from all directions,
and the sun sends out a steady stream of high-energy particles known as the solar wind.
Genesis 1:
6 describes the firmament (Hebrew raqia) separating the water below from the water above.
Before the flood described in Genesis,
the magnetic field may even have helped to suspend the firmament above the earth.

Is the Earth's field changing?
Scientists have made many careful measurements of the magnetic field over 150 years.
These measurements show that the magnetic field is slowly shrinking.
The intensity of the field decreases by half in 1400 years.
This means that as time goes on we have less protection from cosmic radiation and the solar wind.

How strong has it been?
In 560 A.
D.
the field was twice as strong as it is now.
In David's kingdom it was four times as strong.
In Noah's time it was eight times as strong.
There are limits to how intense the magnetic field could have been.
If we assume that the field has been decaying at the same rate for 10,
000 years,
the field would have been more intense than that of a magnetic star.
The heat and electrical extremes from such conditions would have made life on earth impossible.


This presents a significant problem for evolutionists and their belief in a 4.
6-billion-year-old earth.
Their answer is the dynamo theory,
which assumes that the core of the earth is made of molten metal (iron-nickel mixture).
Molten material inside the earth is far hotter than the Curie point,
which means that the earth as a whole is not a permanent magnet;
it must be an electromagnet.
The dynamo theory is that slow,
internal convection currents or planetary rotation generates the magnetic field,
and that this mechanism has operated for the assumed 4.
6 billion years.
Since This theory also claims that the field reverses over extremely long periods of time.

Did the field ever change directions?
Of course,
it's dangerous to observe a process for a relatively short period of time
and then declare that the process has been behaving in exactly that way for all of time.
This approach is routinely seen in traditional geology and paleontology (``.
.
.
the present is the key to the past.
'').
However,
in this case uniformitarianism is denounced by the evolutionists.
They point to paleomagnetic measurements in rock formations.
As sediment accumulates or as molten rock cools,
the earth's magnetic field is believed to have aligned the magnetic domains within the material as it hardened,
locking in a record of the orientation of the geomagnetic field at the time.
Measurements of the magnetic-field polarity in ancient volcanic
lava flows show that Earths magnetic field gyrated wildly at one point in time.
Other evidence for a change is that the residual magnetic fields in rock formed
on the ocean floor where the great tectonic plates are pulling apart show a number of different orientations.
The traditional assumption here is that these processes went on at the same rate in the past as we observe today.
However,
during the flood,
when cataclysmic geologic events were occurring at a rapid pace,
these processes may have been recording what happened to the magnetic field over weeks or months instead of hundreds of thousands of years.
Dr. D. R.
Humphreys has studied the physical evidence of magnetic-field reversal and decay and developed
a model that describes the magnetic field as having a high initial strength,
a series of rapid reversals during the flood year,
slower variations until the time of Christ's earthly ministry,
then gradual steady decay.
The idea that the geomagnetic field could have rapidly reversed was rejected by the evolutionary community,
even though a much larger body,
the Sun,
reverses its field every eleven years.
Recent discoveries have added more weight to Dr. Humphreys model.
The April 5,
1995 edition (Vol. 14)
of Science News reported on a Nature article that researchers are finding fresh evidence of extremely-rapid field orientation shifts,
as much as six degrees per day.
The article states that ``if that happened today,
compass needles would swing from magnetic north toward Mexico City in little over a week''.
The article quotes one geophysicist as saying ``that shows the core to be violently active in terms of the magnetic field''.

Violently active?
``...
on that day all the fountains of the deep were broken up.
.
.
'' Genesis 7:11, NKJV.
Will the field build back up again?
- Earth seems to have a broken generator.
More of the observable facts support the model proposed by Dr.
Humphreys.
Whatever happened in the past,
hard evidence exists for a freely-decaying geomagnetic field now.
A collapsing magnetic field encounters resistance,
which generates electrical current,
which generates more magnetic energy.
The result is a slow decay unless new energy is released into the decaying system from an outside source.
``He who was sat on the throne said `Behold,
I make all things new!
'''.
.
.
Revelation 21:
5,
NKJV.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
Copyright © Creation Evidences Museum,
1995.

[ Coal:
Evidence/Young Earth | Evidence for Creation | Magnetic Field | Created Earth |
Macroevolution | Mammoths | Carbon Dating | Evidence for Creation-2 | Scientific Allusions in Scripture ]
http://www.creationevidence.org


Dr. Henry Morris of the Institute for Creation Research has compiled an impressive list of allusions to scientific principles in Scripture. This list actually demonstrates that a matrix of scientific principles underlies the body of Scripture. These principles were not known to the leading minds of the day in which they were written; in fact, many of them contradicted what was being taught at the time. Such a list confirms that the Scriptures are scientifically credible. It further confirms that the Scriptures were supernaturally inspired.

(Compiled by Dr. Henry M. Morris, Defender’s Bible)
 

Sciencex
Phenomenon or Process Scripture

Hydrology

Hydrologic Cycle
Evaporation
Condensation Nuclei
Condensation
Precipitation
Run-off
Oceanic Reservoir
Snow
Hydrologic Balance
Springs in the Sea
 

Ecclesiastes 1:7; Isaiah 55:10
Psalms 135:7; Jeremiah 10:13
Proverbs 8:26
Job 26:8; 37:11, 16
Job 36:26-28
Job 28:10
Psalms 33:7
Job 38:22; Psalms 147:16
Job 28:24-26
Job 38:16
Geology
Principle of Isostasy
Shape of Earth
Rotation of Earth
Gravitation
Rock Erosion
Glacial Period
Uniformitarianism
Dinosaurs
 
Isaiah 40:12; Psalm 104:5-9
Isaiah 40:22; Job 26:10; Psalm 103:12
Job 38:12,14
Job 26:7; 38:6
Job 14:18,19
Job 38:29,30
II Peter 3:4
Job 40,41
Astronomy
Size of Universe
Number of Stars
Uniqueness of Each Star
Precision of Orbits
Job 11:7-9; 22:12; Isaiah 55:9;Jeremiah 31:37
Genesis 22:17; Jeremiah 33:22
I Corinthians 15:41
Jeremiah 31:35,36
Meteorology
Circulation of Atmosphere
Protective Effect of Atmosphere
Oceanic Origin of Rain
Relation of Electricity to Rain
Fluid Dynamics
 
Ecclesiastes 1:6
Isaiah 40:22
Ecclesiastes 1:7
Job 28:26; Jeremiah 10:13
Job 28:25
Biology
Blood Circulation
Psychotherapy
Biogenesis and Stability
Uniqueness of Man
Chemical Nature of Flesh
Cave-men
 
Leviticus 17:11
Proverbs 16:24; 17:22
Genesis 1:11,21,25
Genesis 1:26
Genesis 1:11,24-2:7;3:19
Job 12:23-25; 30:3-8
Physics
Mass-Energy Equivalence
Source of Energy for Earth
Atomic Disintegration
Electrical Transmission of Information
Television
Rapid Transportation

Colossians 1:17; Hebrews 1:3
Psalms 19:6
II Peter 3:10
Job 38:35
Revelation 11:9-11
Daniel 12:4


[ target=_self> Coal:Evidence/Young Earth | Evidence for Creation | Magnetic Field | Created Earth | Macroevolution | Mammoths | Carbon Dating | Evidence for Creation-2 | Scientific Allusions in Scripture ]


http://www.creationevidence.org/cemframes.html